Iraq's Political Future
Three years after the start of the Iraq war, the country finds itself standing before an uncertain future and faced with a wide range of problems. Peter Philipp explains the current situation
Three years since the American invasion, Iraq is suffering from more problems than ever. Iyad Allawi's gloomy view of the future is anything other than mere pessimism
The former interim prime minister of Iraq, Iyad Allawi, can find no more accurate term: what is currently happening in Iraq, he says, can only be described as a civil war. When dozens of people are killed there every day and the violence is only getting worse, then the situation can only be described as desperate and the end of the unified Iraqi state appears to be approaching.
Collapse into ethnic and religious parts
Allawi is a Shiite and former Ba'ath party activist. When he was in exile, he worked for the CIA, and is now the leader of a secular party with 14% of the seats in parliament. He paints a gloomy picture of the future of his country, warning that Iraq is close to collapse into its ethnic and religious parts. It could even end up as a collection of mini-states.
This is not just doom-mongering aimed at bolstering Allawi's claim to be a compromise political figure who can bring the disintegrating political powers of the country back together. There's also a certain amount of realism involved. Never before has Iraq faced so many problems as it does on the third anniversary of the US-led invasion of March 20th, 2003.
Since the attack on the "Golden Mosque" in February, Shiites and Sunnis are engaged in a reckless fight, while the international brigade of terrorists of various hues continues to wreak its havoc.
And if the US troops have over recent days been carrying out a major military operation against terrorists and resistance groups in the so-called "Sunni triangle," it must still be clear to them that they can't stop the terror with tanks and helicopters.
And they won't be able to do it with the Iraqi security forces either, which make up almost half the fighting force currently in operation. Although young Iraqis seem fearless as they continue to present themselves at the recruitment centres, they are also totally without experience and scarcely in a position to bring about real peace and security.
Iyad Allawi has repeatedly criticised the USA's decision to disband the old regime's security forces, instead of making use of it. It was a mistake which it will cost much time – and many victims – to correct.
And there's no political solution in prospect either. Many Iraqis hoped for more security once the democratic process had begun, and above all, once the elections had taken place in December.
Three months have passed since then, and the new parliament has just managed a single short and mainly symbolic meeting. It hasn't succeeded in forming a government – that will still require weeks or months.
Lack of security
The population is increasingly frustrated: it had hoped for more from the elections. Even sober-minded Iraqis have begun to look back at the days of Saddam Hussein with nostalgia.
Perhaps they weren't free then, but at least there was more security. Quite a few people miss the presence of a "strongman," without noticing that that's not really consistent with democracy. And without knowing where the strongman is to come from.
But even those who are frustrated would not want to see the old strongman back. Saddam is dragging out the trial at which he is being made to answer for the killing of Shiite villagers. No-one knows how long the trial will last. They only know it won't get them out of their current misery.
Nor would a US withdrawal. On the contrary: the country would sink even further into chaos. And as a result, each group seems now to be concentrating on protecting its own interests. The Shiites are trying to get more autonomy for their oil-rich south of the country, the Kurds respond with a demand for more independence for their already almost autonomous north.
Only the Sunnis remain, and they are likely to end up empty-handed in this issue, as they are ending up empty-handed in the division of political power. They cannot regain the power they used to have, but they can make having power in Iraq into a fairly bitter experience.
Three years since the American invasion, Iraq is suffering from more problems than ever. And Iyad Allawi's gloomy view of the future is anything other than mere pessimism.
Peter Philipp
© DEUTSCHE WELLE/DW-WORLD.DE 2006
Translated from the German by Michael Lawton
Printversion
Civil War or Hope?
Three years after the start of the Iraq war, the country finds itself standing before an uncertain future and faced with a wide range of problems. Peter Philipp explains the current situation
; "Relatives of those killed by a car bomb in in the market at Nahrawan, near Baghdad (photo: AP)")
Three years since the American invasion, Iraq is suffering from more problems than ever. Iyad Allawi's gloomy view of the future is anything other than mere pessimism
The former interim prime minister of Iraq, Iyad Allawi, can find no more accurate term: what is currently happening in Iraq, he says, can only be described as a civil war. When dozens of people are killed there every day and the violence is only getting worse, then the situation can only be described as desperate and the end of the unified Iraqi state appears to be approaching.Collapse into ethnic and religious parts
Allawi is a Shiite and former Ba'ath party activist. When he was in exile, he worked for the CIA, and is now the leader of a secular party with 14% of the seats in parliament. He paints a gloomy picture of the future of his country, warning that Iraq is close to collapse into its ethnic and religious parts. It could even end up as a collection of mini-states.
This is not just doom-mongering aimed at bolstering Allawi's claim to be a compromise political figure who can bring the disintegrating political powers of the country back together. There's also a certain amount of realism involved. Never before has Iraq faced so many problems as it does on the third anniversary of the US-led invasion of March 20th, 2003.
Since the attack on the "Golden Mosque" in February, Shiites and Sunnis are engaged in a reckless fight, while the international brigade of terrorists of various hues continues to wreak its havoc.
And if the US troops have over recent days been carrying out a major military operation against terrorists and resistance groups in the so-called "Sunni triangle," it must still be clear to them that they can't stop the terror with tanks and helicopters.
And they won't be able to do it with the Iraqi security forces either, which make up almost half the fighting force currently in operation. Although young Iraqis seem fearless as they continue to present themselves at the recruitment centres, they are also totally without experience and scarcely in a position to bring about real peace and security.
Iyad Allawi has repeatedly criticised the USA's decision to disband the old regime's security forces, instead of making use of it. It was a mistake which it will cost much time – and many victims – to correct.
And there's no political solution in prospect either. Many Iraqis hoped for more security once the democratic process had begun, and above all, once the elections had taken place in December.
Three months have passed since then, and the new parliament has just managed a single short and mainly symbolic meeting. It hasn't succeeded in forming a government – that will still require weeks or months.
Lack of security
The population is increasingly frustrated: it had hoped for more from the elections. Even sober-minded Iraqis have begun to look back at the days of Saddam Hussein with nostalgia.
Perhaps they weren't free then, but at least there was more security. Quite a few people miss the presence of a "strongman," without noticing that that's not really consistent with democracy. And without knowing where the strongman is to come from.
But even those who are frustrated would not want to see the old strongman back. Saddam is dragging out the trial at which he is being made to answer for the killing of Shiite villagers. No-one knows how long the trial will last. They only know it won't get them out of their current misery.
Nor would a US withdrawal. On the contrary: the country would sink even further into chaos. And as a result, each group seems now to be concentrating on protecting its own interests. The Shiites are trying to get more autonomy for their oil-rich south of the country, the Kurds respond with a demand for more independence for their already almost autonomous north.
Only the Sunnis remain, and they are likely to end up empty-handed in this issue, as they are ending up empty-handed in the division of political power. They cannot regain the power they used to have, but they can make having power in Iraq into a fairly bitter experience.
Three years since the American invasion, Iraq is suffering from more problems than ever. And Iyad Allawi's gloomy view of the future is anything other than mere pessimism.
Peter Philipp
© DEUTSCHE WELLE/DW-WORLD.DE 2006
Translated from the German by Michael Lawton
Qantara.de
Democracy, Iraq and the Middle East
The Long Shadow of the Authoritarian Past
Iraq had a vibrant civil society and rich layers of secular political argument in the pre-Saddam era. These key ingredients must be reclaimed if democracy is to take root in the Middle East, says Sami Zubaida
Iraq Elections
Conflict along Ethnic and Religious Lines
The allegations of voter fraud in the Iraqi elections have not been disproved; yet the major parties have agreed to go along with the outcome now presented. In this interview Gareth Stansfield, Iraq expert, talks about the troubled waters of Iraqi politics
Interview Ferhad Ibrahim
A Tightrope Walk Toward Democracy
Currently, an end to the Iraq conflict is nowhere in sight. Yet in some parts of the country there are signs of political normalization and an economic revival. Qantara.de spoke with Professor Ferhad Ibrahim upon his return from Iraq.
Democracy, Iraq and the Middle East
The Long Shadow of the Authoritarian Past
Iraq had a vibrant civil society and rich layers of secular political argument in the pre-Saddam era. These key ingredients must be reclaimed if democracy is to take root in the Middle East, says Sami Zubaida
Iraq Elections
Conflict along Ethnic and Religious Lines
The allegations of voter fraud in the Iraqi elections have not been disproved; yet the major parties have agreed to go along with the outcome now presented. In this interview Gareth Stansfield, Iraq expert, talks about the troubled waters of Iraqi politics
Interview Ferhad Ibrahim
A Tightrope Walk Toward Democracy
Currently, an end to the Iraq conflict is nowhere in sight. Yet in some parts of the country there are signs of political normalization and an economic revival. Qantara.de spoke with Professor Ferhad Ibrahim upon his return from Iraq.
Printversion
The scope of the Iranian government's crackdown on dissent since the disputed June 2009 elections is even broader and the abuses more flagrant than previously reported. More on Human Rights Watch...
Renowned Columbia University Iran scholar Hamid Dabashi hosts "The Week in Green: A Window into the Iranian Civil Rights Movement". The weekly program aims to keep audiences plugged in to news and analysis on the pro-reform Green Movement in Iran. More...
The documentary film The Making of Islam: Empire of Faith covers more than a thousand years of history and culture, and a very large part of the world. Watch full PBS documentary on YouTube...
In "Ghost Wars", Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Steve Coll tells the secret history of the CIA's role in Afghanistan, from its covert program against Soviet troops from 1979 to 1989, to the rise of the Taliban, to the secret efforts by CIA officers to capture or kill bin Laden in Afghanistan after 1998. More...
AVAAZ.org is an international civic organisation that promotes political action on issues such as human rights, and religious conflicts. The NGO's "Stop the Clash" video has had nearly 1.5 million views. Click here...