Alliance of Leftist and Islamist Leaders
Hatred of the USA is uniting leftist and Islamist leaders. Anti-Semitic propaganda and conspiracy theories are part of the way they see the world says Wolf-Dieter Vogel in his essay
Here's looking at you, kid: Hugo Chavez's support for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has caused some uncertainty in leftist circles
The stoning of adulteresses; torture carried out in the name of Allah – is this the "better world" that Hugo Chavez dreams of? The alleged election victory of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is, in any case, in the opinion of the Venezuelan leader, "very important for the peoples who are fighting for a better world." In the struggle against the "attacks of global capitalism" – by which he means the dissidents on the streets of Tehran – he has promised full solidarity with the Iranian president.
Nicaraguan head of state Daniel Ortega was also happy. By electing Ahmadinejad, he said, "the Iranian people" had chosen to "reject imperialism in all its forms."
Islamist-socialist axis
It comes as no surprise to learn that the Nicaraguan counts the Iranian amongst his friends. At the latest with their decision to ally themselves with the clergy on banning abortion, Ortega and his Sandinista Liberation Front relinquished any claim to representing emancipatory politics.
Meeting of the 'Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America': common enmity towards the USA is unifying leftist and Islamist anti-imperialists Chavez's support for Ahmadinejad has, however, caused some uncertainty in leftist circles. His "Bolivarian Revolution" has, after all, been firmly on the side of all those – women, homosexuals, lesbians – whose rights have been violated by the mullah regime.
But Chavez's friendly overtures are not really surprising. Though it has tended to be disregarded, and sometimes even had the support of his followers, the Venezuelan leader has been maintaining friendly relations with the Iranian regime for years. And this is about more than just maintaining economic cooperation or his country's membership of Opec.
Chavez, like his Bolivian counterpart Evo Morales, is regularly at pains to stress the closeness of the ties between his country and the Islamic government. During a visit to Tehran in 2005, he emphasised the "common anti-imperialist and revolutionary" virtues, and later praised Iran's struggle against "colonialism, servility and compliance."
Black and white analysis
It is, of course, their common enmity towards the USA that is unifying leftist and Islamist anti-imperialists. Their world view requires a black and white analysis that has little to do with any real and necessary criticism of the imperialistic behaviour of the major powers: for them it is about the "good" oppressed peoples' fight against their enemies, the "outsiders", who attack "their" culture, however that may be defined; the "good people" who are lied to and cheated by propaganda or other influences from "outside".
In short, a view of the world tailor-made for conspiracy theories.
How this works is set out with admirable simplicity on the Chavez website "for the development of socialism in the 21st century", aporrea.org. The workers, students, women and youth of the Islamic Republic chose to vote for Ahmadinejad, according to author, Carlos Aznarez, because "the people are able to recognise someone capable of ably steering the ship through times of storm." Those who choose to oppose him cannot belong to the people and are operating, according to Chavez, with the backing of the EU and the CIA.
Political protest in Venezuela: Chavez's alliance with radical Islamists is making it difficult to take the emancipatory aspirations of the Bolivarian Revolution seriously
Where common interests depend only upon culturally defined understanding of self-determination and hostility to the "empire" then, naturally, Hezbollah and Hamas, too, are counted as being among the important allies.
It is worth noting that Chavez in his expressions of solidarity with the Islamist organisations does not stop at merely criticising the Israeli attacks on Gaza or Lebanon. Instead, in a style rather reminiscent of Ahmadinejad himself, he goes on to equate them with the acts of terror perpetrated by the Nazis.
Anti-Semitic propaganda
The Anti-Defamation-League (ADL) has pointed out that, in the wake of the president's rhetoric during the war in Lebanon, Chavez-inspired groups were actively engaged in spreading anti-Semitic propaganda, involving caricatures that featured both the Star of David and swastika, "Jews Out" graffiti and the like.
The ADL quoted the pro-government newspaper El Diario de Caracas as saying that "the Jewish race is doomed to disappear". Is it any wonder, then, that similar declarations of support for holocaust-denier Ahmadinejad have also been voiced in Bolivarian Revolution circles during the course of current events in Iran? Aznarez was quick to expose opposition mobilisation as something orchestrated by "North American-Israeli Zionistic fascism."
Obstructing investigations
Such attitudes of course are not limited merely to the followers of the "Bolivarian Revolution". The more radical the group on the Latin American left, the more criticism of US or Israeli actions tends to be replaced by gestures of solidarity with dictatorial regimes and displays of anti-Semitic resentment.
"Attacks of global capitalism": According to Chavez's anti-imperialist reading, the Iranian protests after the controversial elections were part of US-sponsored propaganda
In May, in Buenos Aires, in a gesture of solidarity with their "Palestinian cousins", a group of thugs violently disrupted a ceremony to mark the foundation of the state of Israel. The left has also been guilty of obstructing investigations into an attack on a Jewish community centre in the Argentinean capital in 1994 when 88 people died. The reason being that prosecution of those responsible, believed to be within the Iranian government, would legitimise US military action.
In the Mexican left-wing newspaper La Jornada, commentator José Steinsleger congratulated Hezbollah following the Lebanon war for "sending out a message of hope to oppressed peoples throughout the world."
Islamist organisations as deliverers of the oppressed? Even in the national liberation movements of the 1960s to 1980s the idea of the social revolution often got lost amongst the anti-imperial rhetoric. Whilst at that time criteria such as human rights or class struggle at least existed as an ideal, the current anti-imperialist protest often emanates from regimes and movements whose objectives fall far short of the achievements of the bourgeois revolution.
Those who give support to such regimes are not only supporting torture, stoning and murder in the name of Allah, they are also making it difficult to take the emancipatory aspirations of the Bolivarian Revolution seriously. "Good" oppressed peoples fighting against the enemies of the nation, the "outsiders" who attack one's "own" culture – however that may be defined.
Wolf-Dieter Vogel
© Qantara.de 2009
Journalist Wolf-Dieter Vogel lived in Mexico City for six years. He has worked for the Nachrichtenpool Lateinamerika (news pool Latin America, ARD Radio and the Taz newspaper. He now lives in Berlin.
Translated from the German by Ron Walker
Printversion
False Friends
Hatred of the USA is uniting leftist and Islamist leaders. Anti-Semitic propaganda and conspiracy theories are part of the way they see the world says Wolf-Dieter Vogel in his essay
; "Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chávez (photo: dpa)")
Here's looking at you, kid: Hugo Chavez's support for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has caused some uncertainty in leftist circles
The stoning of adulteresses; torture carried out in the name of Allah – is this the "better world" that Hugo Chavez dreams of? The alleged election victory of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is, in any case, in the opinion of the Venezuelan leader, "very important for the peoples who are fighting for a better world." In the struggle against the "attacks of global capitalism" – by which he means the dissidents on the streets of Tehran – he has promised full solidarity with the Iranian president.Nicaraguan head of state Daniel Ortega was also happy. By electing Ahmadinejad, he said, "the Iranian people" had chosen to "reject imperialism in all its forms."
Islamist-socialist axis
It comes as no surprise to learn that the Nicaraguan counts the Iranian amongst his friends. At the latest with their decision to ally themselves with the clergy on banning abortion, Ortega and his Sandinista Liberation Front relinquished any claim to representing emancipatory politics.
Meeting of the 'Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America': common enmity towards the USA is unifying leftist and Islamist anti-imperialists Chavez's support for Ahmadinejad has, however, caused some uncertainty in leftist circles. His "Bolivarian Revolution" has, after all, been firmly on the side of all those – women, homosexuals, lesbians – whose rights have been violated by the mullah regime.
But Chavez's friendly overtures are not really surprising. Though it has tended to be disregarded, and sometimes even had the support of his followers, the Venezuelan leader has been maintaining friendly relations with the Iranian regime for years. And this is about more than just maintaining economic cooperation or his country's membership of Opec.
Chavez, like his Bolivian counterpart Evo Morales, is regularly at pains to stress the closeness of the ties between his country and the Islamic government. During a visit to Tehran in 2005, he emphasised the "common anti-imperialist and revolutionary" virtues, and later praised Iran's struggle against "colonialism, servility and compliance."
Black and white analysis
It is, of course, their common enmity towards the USA that is unifying leftist and Islamist anti-imperialists. Their world view requires a black and white analysis that has little to do with any real and necessary criticism of the imperialistic behaviour of the major powers: for them it is about the "good" oppressed peoples' fight against their enemies, the "outsiders", who attack "their" culture, however that may be defined; the "good people" who are lied to and cheated by propaganda or other influences from "outside".
In short, a view of the world tailor-made for conspiracy theories.
How this works is set out with admirable simplicity on the Chavez website "for the development of socialism in the 21st century", aporrea.org. The workers, students, women and youth of the Islamic Republic chose to vote for Ahmadinejad, according to author, Carlos Aznarez, because "the people are able to recognise someone capable of ably steering the ship through times of storm." Those who choose to oppose him cannot belong to the people and are operating, according to Chavez, with the backing of the EU and the CIA.
; "Anti-Chávez demontration in Venezuela (photo: AP)")
Political protest in Venezuela: Chavez's alliance with radical Islamists is making it difficult to take the emancipatory aspirations of the Bolivarian Revolution seriously
Where common interests depend only upon culturally defined understanding of self-determination and hostility to the "empire" then, naturally, Hezbollah and Hamas, too, are counted as being among the important allies.It is worth noting that Chavez in his expressions of solidarity with the Islamist organisations does not stop at merely criticising the Israeli attacks on Gaza or Lebanon. Instead, in a style rather reminiscent of Ahmadinejad himself, he goes on to equate them with the acts of terror perpetrated by the Nazis.
Anti-Semitic propaganda
The Anti-Defamation-League (ADL) has pointed out that, in the wake of the president's rhetoric during the war in Lebanon, Chavez-inspired groups were actively engaged in spreading anti-Semitic propaganda, involving caricatures that featured both the Star of David and swastika, "Jews Out" graffiti and the like.
The ADL quoted the pro-government newspaper El Diario de Caracas as saying that "the Jewish race is doomed to disappear". Is it any wonder, then, that similar declarations of support for holocaust-denier Ahmadinejad have also been voiced in Bolivarian Revolution circles during the course of current events in Iran? Aznarez was quick to expose opposition mobilisation as something orchestrated by "North American-Israeli Zionistic fascism."
Obstructing investigations
Such attitudes of course are not limited merely to the followers of the "Bolivarian Revolution". The more radical the group on the Latin American left, the more criticism of US or Israeli actions tends to be replaced by gestures of solidarity with dictatorial regimes and displays of anti-Semitic resentment.
; "Demontrations after election victory of Ahmadinejad in Teheran (photo: AP)")
"Attacks of global capitalism": According to Chavez's anti-imperialist reading, the Iranian protests after the controversial elections were part of US-sponsored propaganda
In May, in Buenos Aires, in a gesture of solidarity with their "Palestinian cousins", a group of thugs violently disrupted a ceremony to mark the foundation of the state of Israel. The left has also been guilty of obstructing investigations into an attack on a Jewish community centre in the Argentinean capital in 1994 when 88 people died. The reason being that prosecution of those responsible, believed to be within the Iranian government, would legitimise US military action. In the Mexican left-wing newspaper La Jornada, commentator José Steinsleger congratulated Hezbollah following the Lebanon war for "sending out a message of hope to oppressed peoples throughout the world."
Islamist organisations as deliverers of the oppressed? Even in the national liberation movements of the 1960s to 1980s the idea of the social revolution often got lost amongst the anti-imperial rhetoric. Whilst at that time criteria such as human rights or class struggle at least existed as an ideal, the current anti-imperialist protest often emanates from regimes and movements whose objectives fall far short of the achievements of the bourgeois revolution.
Those who give support to such regimes are not only supporting torture, stoning and murder in the name of Allah, they are also making it difficult to take the emancipatory aspirations of the Bolivarian Revolution seriously. "Good" oppressed peoples fighting against the enemies of the nation, the "outsiders" who attack one's "own" culture – however that may be defined.
Wolf-Dieter Vogel
© Qantara.de 2009
Journalist Wolf-Dieter Vogel lived in Mexico City for six years. He has worked for the Nachrichtenpool Lateinamerika (news pool Latin America, ARD Radio and the Taz newspaper. He now lives in Berlin.
Translated from the German by Ron Walker
Qantara.de
Protest Movement in Iran
Fighting the Arrogance of Power
In Iran the talk is no longer simply of election fraud. The issue has long since become the regime's ignorance of the population and its contempt for their intelligence, writes the Iranian cultural journalist Parandis Ahmadi*
Controversial Election Results in Iran
A Silence that Speaks Volumes
Iran's Shia clerics are obviously unhappy with the current situation; their silence is deafening. In the run-up to the election, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad obviously made a number of enemies amongst the clergy. Bahman Nirumand has the details
Tunisian-French Feminist Sophie Bessis
Identity as Folklore
Sophie Bessis is one of the best-known French-speaking feminists from the Maghreb. In her fight for women's rights, she moves between the conflicting worlds of Europe and Africa, showing equal disdain for Western arrogance and for what is often the pronounced identity policy of the Orient. Kersten Knipp met with Sophie Bessis
Protest Movement in Iran
Fighting the Arrogance of Power
In Iran the talk is no longer simply of election fraud. The issue has long since become the regime's ignorance of the population and its contempt for their intelligence, writes the Iranian cultural journalist Parandis Ahmadi*
Controversial Election Results in Iran
A Silence that Speaks Volumes
Iran's Shia clerics are obviously unhappy with the current situation; their silence is deafening. In the run-up to the election, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad obviously made a number of enemies amongst the clergy. Bahman Nirumand has the details
Tunisian-French Feminist Sophie Bessis
Identity as Folklore
Sophie Bessis is one of the best-known French-speaking feminists from the Maghreb. In her fight for women's rights, she moves between the conflicting worlds of Europe and Africa, showing equal disdain for Western arrogance and for what is often the pronounced identity policy of the Orient. Kersten Knipp met with Sophie Bessis
Printversion
Comments
1. debunking
Far from debunking Chavez' inclination (see #2), the article in zmag reinforces the impression.
lewis lorton | 25.09.2009 - 13:34
2. Another political hit peice / broadside
The claims about Chavez's incitement of anti-Semitism are thoroughly debunked here: http://www.zmag.org/znet/viewArticle/22576
Dylan Henderson | 17.09.2009 - 02:02
3. Agree
Fine article which I can confirm. Here in traditionally leftist San Francisco, the new antisemitic signs at Left demonstrations amazed progressive Jews. (Only African Americans vote Democratic in greater percentage.) Attempts at outreach are rebuffed. I was reading this publication for some new ideas, bored with the "blame Bush" stuff, which is getting old. Many pacifist appeasement types would be happy to give Islamism "the Jews" because they haven't got Czechoslovakia to give them. If only there really were "the Jews," united and monolithic like that, instead of the divided reality.
Prof. G. Leonard | 16.09.2009 - 16:58
4. Double standards, any one?
Did qantara publish an article of a similar tone when Obama met the Saudis and the Egyptians?
Austin Mackell | 16.09.2009 - 12:52
5. Of course it's not surprising
The previous comments are right on the nail. Bush and the neocons pulled off an amazing stunt: they managed to unite the world's most dangerous extremists - left, right, and religious - into a single cohesive front. Well done.
David Sutherland | 16.09.2009 - 10:23
6. Is this surprising
This isn't surprising given that the American Right conflates all of America's enemies past and present into one coherent blob. Hence why the conservative protesters can call Obama a Nazi (while they themselves perfectly resemble in style and substance quasi-nazi brownshirts) and a Communist and a Muslim extremist simultaneously despite the fact that those are warring ideologies.
Brian Erb | 15.09.2009 - 16:50
Add a comment
The Arab Press Network is a digital network which supports the development of a stronger independent press in the Arab world. Click here for more...
The documentary film The Making of Islam: Empire of Faith covers more than a thousand years of history and culture, and a very large part of the world. Watch full PBS documentary on YouTube...
In "Ghost Wars", Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Steve Coll tells the secret history of the CIA's role in Afghanistan, from its covert program against Soviet troops from 1979 to 1989, to the rise of the Taliban, to the secret efforts by CIA officers to capture or kill bin Laden in Afghanistan after 1998. More...
bianet is a network for monitoring and covering media freedom and independent journalism in Turkey. It's aim is to raise public awareness of social and cultural value of information. Click here...
niqash is a trilingual website (Arabic, English, Kurdish) on politics, media and culture in Iraq. Since March 2005 a network of Iraqi correspondents delivers reports, interviews and analysis on various topics...
AVAAZ.org is an international civic organisation that promotes political action on issues such as human rights, and religious conflicts. The NGO's "Stop the Clash" video has had nearly 1.5 million views. Click here...